Skip to content

Female Genital Mutilation, Islam and Leftist Silence

October 1, 2009


My recent NewsReal blog on Naomi Wolf and female genital mutilation (FGM) – also posted at and — has triggered a heated debate in the blogs’ comments sections on all three sites. The key arguments in these three sections personify some of the Left’s key tactics in its romance with tyranny and terror. It is crucial to shed light on these arguments in order to crystallize the malice, dishonesty and heartlessness which lie at the center of the leftist agenda. It also helps strengthen our efforts to fight on behalf of tyranny’s victims, which, in this case, are the hundreds of thousands of young girls who face the barbarity of female genital mutilation yearly around the world.

The recent controversy surrounds a Frontpage interview I did with Ines Laufer, an anti-FGM activist. Along with Lucy Mashua, a Kenyan victim of FGM, she is presently leading a new campaign,, to protect girls from this barbarity.

In my NewsReal blog, I raised the question of whether Naomi Wolf, who postures as a feminist concerned with women’s rights, will be at all interested in joining Laufer’s and Mashua’s campaign. The issue at stake here is that leftist feminists pretend they care about women, but when it comes to women who suffer under adversary cultures, they refuse to act, since doing so will legitimize their own societies which they despise and work to destroy. Thus, millions of women under Islamic gender apartheid have been abandoned by  leftist feminists, whose devotions lie with their anti-Western and anti-American faiths. The scholar and true feminist Phyllis Chesler has documented this phenomenon powerfully in her book The Death of Feminism.

To stress the main essence of this problem regarding Wolf and the hypocrites in her “feminist” camp, I asked in my blog:

“Will Naomi Wolf join the battle? For instance, will she denounce the Islamic theology and teachings that lead to the mutilation of Muslim girls in Islamic countries?”

My critics who seek to delegitimize my main point have now come forward and think they are scoring a powerful blow against me by, typically, pointing out that FGM is not exclusively Muslim. This is a key traditional tactic of the Left. In order to whitewash the barbarity of adversary cultures, they consistently exonerate it by pointing out that some kind of injustice exists somewhere else — and, especially, of course, how it exists in our own society and civilization.

Thus, some of the critics revel in how Lucy Semiyan Mashua, who is leading the new campaign against FGM, is from Kenya and comes from the Massai, a Christian African tribe. This is how their mental gymnastics work: FGM is not just an Islamic practice, so we can’t say anything critical about Islam when it is connected to FGM. This way we can’t say that anything is really better than anything else, and we especially can’t say that our civilization is better than Islam’s or that we have anything to teach Islamic societies.

This kind of thinking deliberately incapacitates any action that could be implemented on behalf of Islam’s victims. If you try to do something on behalf of the victims, which begins with honesty about who is perpetrating the crime and why, the critics come forward and say: “Hey, but it isn’t just Muslims that do it.” Then the critics feel really good about themselves for pointing this out and, yes, go home and do nothing about the subject at hand. So in the case of FGM, the leftist feels self-satisfied that he’s pointed out that it’s not just Islam that does it, he engages in no action to help the victims and the mutilation of girls under Islam continues.

Naturally, Muslims are not the only ones who perpetrate FGM. Of course, FGM is practised outside of Islam, including under non-Islamic African tribal cultures. I never said anywhere that FGM is only practiced by Muslims. But the key issue here is that Muslims are the principal religious group that practices this sexual violence against women. And the reality is that if you are a victim of FGM, then the chances are very high that you live in a Muslim household and in a Muslim culture.

Now within the context of Islamic FGM, the barbarity is kept alive and legitimized by Islamic theology. This is the case in Egypt, where this crime against girls is waged on a massive scale. The Egyptian government banned FGM in 1996, but an Egyptian court overturned the ban in July 1997 because of the ferocious uprising of the Islamic clerics, who fervently pointed to Islamic teachings to re-implement this war against women’s sexuality. The Muslim mutilators pointed to traditional Islamic teachings that sanction FGM, which include the Prophet Muhammad’s instruction that circumcising girls is “a preservation of honor for women.” Also, a legal manual of the Shafi’i school of Islamic jurisprudence, ‘Umdat al-Salik, which is endorsed by Al-Azhar University of Cairo — the oldest and most prestigious university in the Islamic world — states that circumcision is obligatory for both boys and girls.

Keeping FGM institutionalized also helps the Islamic mutilators keep the structure of Islamic gender apartheid in place. Keeping FGM legitimized and at work is one of the most effective means of keeping women subjugated and caged. After all, the strategy behind amputating the clitoris is clearly to kill the woman’s sexual desire and pleasure, which, in this diseased misogynist mindset, reduces the chances that she will ever toy with the notions of autonomy, equality and self-determination.

Question: How can we possibly help Egyptian girls, and other girls who are targeted for FGM under Islam, if we do not confront the philosophy behind the institutionalization of this violence? You cannot save Muslim girls from FGM without crystallizing what it is within the religion that gives fertile soil and legitimization to FGM. The way to save human beings from this violence is to isolate those teachings and to have them nullified – and this involves confronting certain Islamic teachings.

Nowhere am I saying that we don’t work against FGM in non-Muslim environments. We do that too. We do it all. But we can’t save the victims of Islamic mutilation if we are not honest about the Islamic impulses for that mutilation.

So the main point of my Newsreal blog, where I asked whether Naomi Wolf would join the battle against FGM, was to point out the hypocrisy of the Left’s silence on this matter. It’s a silence that stems from the fact that leftists like Wolf know that admitting the inferiority of an adversarial culture will legitimize Western civilization, a recognition that they cannot make without risking their entire identities as social critics. That’s why the leftist forces in our society do their best to excuse FGM with the tired old mantra: it’s not only Muslims that do it – as if inaction to save human beings from evil is somehow justified because a sin might exist somewhere else.

What a revolting image: the smug leftist turning his or her back on the victims of Islamic FGM because a non-Muslim somewhere perpetrated FGM. How does this self-satisfied inhumanity save the Muslim girls who will be mutilated in the future? How does it help the non-Muslim girls?

Hypothetical question: if we could have saved the Jewish inmates from Auschwitz before they were murdered, would it have been right to abort the rescue operation (which would have involved an honesty about Nazi doctrine) upon discovering that someone, somewhere, in some other place, said or did something anti-Semitic? Hey, it’s not just the Nazis that do it. Would that have sufficed to justify not lifting a hand to rescue Auschwitz’s inmates?

Some other connected tactics surface in the debate in the comments sections on my blog.  One critic thinks he is making a big point by stating that Morocco, one of the countries that Wolf visited during her political pilgrimage, does not practice FGM. But whatever the extent to which FGM is practiced or not in Morocco, the point is that it is practiced in Egypt and Jordan – where Wolf visited and says she found a vibrant sexuality lurking under the veil.

Another critic thinks she has scored a knockout blow against me by revealing that she did a Google search and found that Wolf has written about FGM. The issue is not whether Wolf has written about FGM. The issue is whether she has condemned the societies and cultures within which it is practiced, and whether she has done so on the premise that our society is more humane and has something to teach those societies and cultures. She has not. In The Beauty Myth, for instance, Wolf makes a critique of FGM only in passing, with a “everyone is guilty” theme that ends up comparing FGM with modern-day breast surgery.

The core issue is that Wolf does not voice her moral indignation against Islamic FGM and the Islamic theology that serves as its fertile soil. She does not condemn African tribal FGM for its African tribal roots, but in the context of how a universal misogyny is somehow responsible.

Thus, in the Islamic context, for instance, it is clear that someone like Wolf will never act, because protecting little girls’ genitals is less important for her than protecting herself from the charge of being Islamophobic. Her anti-Americanism, ultimately, has to be prioritized in a sacred and protected place.

In essence, because of Naomi Wolf and her like-minded feminist comrades, here is the situation: if you are a victimized girl being abused in a Muslim culture, then you have the unfortunate distinction of being part of a group that the West and FGM activists have difficulty helping, because the lib-Left has made sure that the Muslim culture and religion can never be criticized and, therefore, that its victims can never be protected or saved.

This is just another chapter of a long, dark and grotesque story – the story of the Left, with its hands drenched in human blood, sacrificing human beings on the altar of utopian ideals.

[Editors’ note: Read more about the Left’ complicity in Islamic gender apartheid in Jamie Glazov’s new book, United in Hate: The Left’s Romance with Tyranny and Terror]

United in Hate cover

Add to FacebookAdd to DiggAdd to Del.icio.usAdd to StumbleuponAdd to RedditAdd to BlinklistAdd to TwitterAdd to TechnoratiAdd to FurlAdd to Newsvine

  1. clyde griffin permalink
    October 2, 2009 1:38 am


  2. David Holmes permalink
    October 2, 2009 2:29 am

    Naomi Wolf reminds me of the public defender who only has positive things to say about her client – irrespective of the horrendous nature of the crime.
    The truth today is suppressed and smothered beneath a blanket of ignorance and political niceties.
    I am tired of the “I don’t want to know the truth” attitude of so-called intellectuals who on the face of it appear to understand the facts, yet often get stuck on the final step in condemning what they must rationally conclude is false, corrupt and lacking in logical reasoning.
    It seems that Ms Wolf has met some lovely Muslim women and concluded that it would be wrong to now condemn their faith, even though it may be flawed and physically damaging to women.
    This kind of rationale is akin to asking your best friend for support, knowing that he/she will defend your rights irrespective of whether you are right or wrong.
    Right and wrong exist whether we believe so or not. So, sorry to hurt your feelings if you are a Muslim woman who is not mutilated, but there are those in your club who are barbaric and must be recognized as such.

  3. jbtrevor permalink
    October 2, 2009 4:35 am

    Naomi Wolf exemplifies my opinion of American Feminist Women – overly concerned with self.

  4. Joseph White permalink
    October 2, 2009 5:05 am

    The only way that modern feminists would ever speak out against FMG and islam, would be if they were the ones about to undergo the forced surgery.

    The mental disease that is liberalism doesn’t understand that there is evil in the world, and it can’t be reckoned with.

    The fact that a bunch of barbarians carry out such travesties against young women is a sign that they have no brain and can’t carry out independant thought. Because, if they could, they wouldn’t just bow down to the clerics and accept what they say at face value.

    As much as I hate to say it, (No, that’s not right. I say it because it’s true,) Islam has to die a bloody wheezing death, so that the world can move on toward the future.

  5. October 2, 2009 7:29 am

    I recommend Jamie’s book: it is excellent.

  6. Ellen permalink
    October 2, 2009 9:59 am

    Thank you for your article and your commitment about FGM
    Your question : How can we help girls and women? In repairing the clitoris.
    We have the chance to have the Dr Foldes, a French urologist and surgeon who had developed a technique to help victims of FMG get their clitoral sensation back. Further we have created Clitoraid dedicated to ending FGM once and for all and to raising funds to pay for the operations of as many women as possible. Clitoraid mission: to help a many FGM victims as possible regain their dignity and their sense of pleasure and in the process, help eliminate FMG.
    Some information about the construction of the pleasure hospital in Burkina Faso.
    Talk around you so that the world is changing for women : :

    • SabbyWrt permalink
      October 2, 2009 2:31 pm

      Ellen, That is a wonderful program and deserves all of the help we can muster. But let me tell you a story and it is only one of many. I was working in the ED one evening and needed to obtain a urine specimen from a 19 year old who spoke no English. It had to be a very clean specimen so I had to get a catheterized specimen. I went into the room and this man was there with her. He was identified to me as her uncle. He would not leave the room and stood over me. Honestly, he was threatening even to me and I felt like punching his lights out. As I helped this woman undress he would not even turn his back. I knew I could not throw him out because he might take my patient away and she was very sick. This woman was so mutilated that I could find no urethral opening at all ….. it was just gone in a mass of twisted flesh that looked like a burn victim. She was one of the saddest little creatures I have ever encountered. It was very clear to me that she was terrified of this man. I was haunted by the fact that if I was afraid of her uncle then her life must be a nightmare. I will not go into the rest about this patient or my thoughts/feelings because it is to long.

      So, this program will work for women that are able to leave the abuse but not for the ones still in it or the ones that will come after them. We have to get to the root of the problem and defeat the ideology. That will not be possible without experts speaking out and taking it to the grass roots level. The women at the grass roots must know that they have other people here in the west standing on their side. Ms. Wolf has a following and could do much to support the grass roots. But I am not holding my breath.

      What would be so great is to have a Glazov & Chessler PSA or something. It is not lost on me that it is now the guys taking on FGM and I am so very happy for this. Thanks guys for fighting for the girls. Your care and concern for women inspires me
      Wow! This is long sorry guys!

    • SabbyWrt permalink
      October 2, 2009 4:14 pm

      PS Ellen that dude that started clitraid is very strange.

      • Ellen permalink
        October 3, 2009 9:49 am

        Hi SabbyWrt
        For knowing more about this guy, the last Prophet :

  7. Jack Hampton permalink
    October 2, 2009 1:08 pm

    Another superb article thank you.
    I realized years ago the the first time I heard Wolf speak that she was without any moral decency period. Some will say extreme but that was my impression.

  8. Judy permalink
    October 2, 2009 1:22 pm

    Julie, how true. Wolf falls into the category of intellectual barbarian. Within Wolf’s deeply held anti-American ideology, beats the heart of a coward that chooses not to confront the injustices committed against the helpless within a tyrannical society in order to save herself from re-examining the origins of her hatred of Western beliefs. Naomi,there are no happy oppressed, mutilated, beaten women that live in isolation and violence. Sheer ignorance.

  9. ccg permalink
    October 3, 2009 9:50 pm

    Islam is not a peaceful religion. They don’t truly know what peace is. They have their “honor killings” which in fact is a different name for murder. You don’t hear of men being killed/murdered for honor on a regular basis, just women.

    If a man is not satisfied with his wife he can cut off her nose, or her head, or pour acid on her.

    Islam seems to be only for the sick men that follow it, and their brainwashed women. These poor pathetic men that cannot be trusted to control themselves forces the women to wear a covering from head to toe so they will not be tempted. Excuse me, what about a little self control. Oh no, they control the woman, not themselves.

    Islam is quite scary and we need to open our eyes to this problem that is trying to take over the world. They do not like us, and call us infidels. What a joke. It is all right for them to lie to us who do not believe in their false god and cowardly ways. This is in the Koran that they should do this. They can also kill/murder the infidels (that’s us folks).

    We now have a President who is putting more and more Muslims in the White House. This is definitely a dangerous move and we need to have our eyes opened to the fact that we are in trouble here in more ways than just one.

    I would not ever want to be under Islam as the rule of the land, but we are getting more and more Sharia law here in this country. It needs to be stopped.

    • Jack Hampton permalink
      October 4, 2009 6:51 am

      No one abhors Islame more than my slef but can you name me one place in this nation that is under the control of Sharia law? I do not believe you can.

      • radmdau permalink
        October 4, 2009 8:49 pm


        there isn’t anywhere in the US that is officially under shari’a law, but we now have banks who are using shari’a laws to bank and to finance. Special, just for Muslims. And, sharia compliant mortgagees. Even in Texas! And, there are pockets of places in the US, where there are Muslim communities, who practice shari’a law – under the table, of course. And, some courts are considering allowing it for domestic issues, as long as it doesn’t go against US law, of course,So, don’t think it hasn’t gotten a toe-hold here in the US, because it has. In fact, if you have any credit cards, that bank may very well be doing sharia banking.

        Now, if you take a good look at what’s happening in England, how the demand for shari’a law has increased, and how, to satisfy that demand the gov’t has given in and allowed its usage for domestic issues and things like loan squabbles and stuff like that. It didn’t take long after the initial requests for the govt to grant it – only a couple of years.

        We’re close to that here.

  10. Jack Hampton permalink
    October 5, 2009 5:47 am

    There might be some place a form of it might be used for mediationbut that in no way would allow for it to be substituted in any way for criminal or civil court proceedings. as for the banking you spek of that would violate the banking regulations and laws can you guide me to one of those banks so I can file a formal complaint? Also to0 any court where sheria court is passing any judgments or handing out sentencing to defendants so I can get that referred to the appropriate AG?

Comments are closed.