Skip to content

A Spoonful of Saccharine: Maddow accuses Senator DeMint of “Treason”

October 2, 2009

maddow10-2Click here to learn more about Tim and Alissa Birkel’s “A Spoonful of Saccharine” series critiquing The Rachel Maddow Show.

If you get your news from MSNBC, or any other wholly-owned subsidiary of the American Left, then you probably have very little understanding of what’s happening in Honduras. If you’ve heard anything, no doubt you’ve had the word “coup” pounded into your head over and over. There’s only one problem—it was not really a coup. The removal of former president Manuel Zelaya was mostly in accordance with the rule of law.

Here’s a brief history, courtesy of that known right-wing rag, the Washington Post:

“Honduras’s deposed president, Manuel Zelaya, bears the biggest responsibility for his overthrow. A member of the rancid oligarchy he now decries, Zelaya took office in 2006 as the leader of one of the two center-right parties that have dominated Honduran politics for decades. His general platform, his support for the Central American Free Trade Agreement with the United States and his alliances with business organizations gave no inkling of the fact that halfway into his term he would become a political cross-dresser.

“Suddenly, in 2007, he declared himself a socialist and began to establish close ties with Venezuela….…Last year, following the script originally laid out by Chávez in Venezuela and adopted by Evo Morales in Bolivia and Rafael Correa in Ecuador, Zelaya announced that he would hold a referendum to set up a constituent assembly that would change the constitution that barred him from reelection. In the next few months, every legal body in Honduras — the electoral tribunal, the Supreme Court, the attorney general, the human rights ombudsman — declared the referendum unconstitutional. According to the Honduran constitution (articles 5, 373 and 374), presidential term limits cannot be changed under any circumstance; only Congress can modify the constitution; and political institutions are not subject to referendums. Honduras’s Congress, Zelaya’s own Liberal Party and a majority of Hondurans (in various polls) expressed their horror at the prospect of having Zelaya perpetuate himself and bring Honduras into the Chávez fold. In defiance of court orders, Zelaya persisted…This is the context in which the military, in an ill-advised move that turned a perfectly legal mechanism for stopping Zelaya into a coup, expelled the president. The fact that the constitutional procedure was subsequently followed by having Congress appoint the head of the legislative body, Roberto Micheletti, as interim president, and that the elections scheduled for November have not been canceled, is not enough to dissipate the cloud of illegitimacy that hangs over the new government. This factor has disarmed Zelaya’s critics in the international community in the face of a well-coordinated campaign led by Chávez to reinstate him”

zelaya4True, the military did jump the gun, but this is no military takeover. The military are not in power. The rules are being followed. Zelaya is the one calling for “insurrection” from his supporters. Zelaya is the one who has decided he likes the taste of power and, spurred on by the successes of Venezualan “President” Hugo Chavez and his ilk in undermining democracy and turning themselves into “elected” dictator, has decided he’s rather like to keep that power, never mind the law.

Yet this is the man that President Obama has sided with—and in the process, with Hugo Chavez, who is already using this as an excuse to flex his muscles, and whatever Castro is really running Cuba at the moment, and against the rule of law. The President of the United States has sided with anti-democratic thugs and petty dictators.

How much are we willing to let this man influence our foreign policy?

How much are we willing to let this man influence our foreign policy?

But on her show Thursday, Rachel Maddow had the temerity to accuse Senator Jim DeMint of treason for disagreeing with Obama and suggesting to some Hondurans that maybe they should abide by the rule of law in their own country, and not let pressure from their radical leftist neighbors and their useful-idiot American President force them to reinstate a would-be tinpot dictator.

To that, MAddow has this to say: “What would you call that?  Is it maybe a word that starts with T and rhymes with reason?” Maddow cited the Logan Act, and repeatedly expressed outrage that DeMint wouldn’t simply line up behind the Obama government’s policies. We fail to remember Maddow being so deferential to the previous administration. In fact, Maddow makes an interesting slip of the tongue in saying that DeMint was “elected to serve the government.” Wrong, Rachel. He was elected to serve the people and the Constitution. Not to rubberstamp unwise foreign policy decisions. The left may not always like it, but independent thought is still allowed in this country.

The even more incredible universal irony of the situation is that one Senator John Kerry (D-MA) put a stop to DeMint’s Honduran trip. Yes, this is the same John Kerry who has a long and sordid history of acts which run far more afoul of the Logan Act than anything DeMint might have done. Nor is Kerry the only sitting Democrat to potentially violate the act. Furthermore, lest Rachel forget, it was her own hero Mr. Obama who attempted to negotiate with Iraq for a troop withdrawal before he had gone through the minor formality of actually winning the Presidency, an act for which there were also calls that he’d violated the Logan Act.

We note that, as many articles on the Logan Act are quick to point out, no one has ever been prosecuted for violating it. The Act stands more like a nuclear ICBM—more a deterrent than an actual weapon. So it’s obvious that Senator DeMint faces little chance of actually being charged with anything. The attacks on him are little more than leftist rhetorical attacks against a man who dared disagree with Obama’s foreign policy. Remember the ever-evolving Newspeak, people. Last year, dissent meant “the highest form of patriotism.” This year, dissent is “the lowest form of racism.” Even when what you’re dissenting against is our country’s enthusiastic support of would-be dictators.

We remember the candidate Obama’s promises to make us more respected abroad. We just didn’t know that the “respect” would come from socialist dictators the world over. This country is supposed to be the last best hope for freedom. What does it say when we will suborn our foreign policy to the wishes of those who hold freedom in absolutely no regard? And what does it say when the loudest, most vicious voices in the media attach those who dare to ask whether that is really best for anyone—the American people, or the people of the world.

  1. In the know permalink
    October 2, 2009 1:55 pm

    HHHmmmmm. Who flew to Syria and engaged in diplomatic talks with Assad? That was against the law but she was never prosecuted by the previous administration? When will conservatives stop giving neo communists the opportunity to stab us in the back?

  2. Elaine permalink
    October 3, 2009 6:58 am

    Maddow is probably hoping that when Comrade Obama becomes dictator for life she will be his #1 propaganda czar.

  3. j c original permalink
    October 3, 2009 10:56 am

    After picking up my 5th grade grandson from football practice who attends a non-government school-we started talking about the Constitution and the I told him about Honduras,gave him some background and relayed that their Constitution does not allow the dictator to be President again, but that our President Obama is backing the dictator and going against the people and their Constitution.,He said, Stop talking Papa!!! and he quickly asked and answered his own question..Do you know why Obama is backing the dictator, It’s because he wants to be President of world, everyone knows that Papa. I said OH, well how did you do at practice today…

  4. Joy permalink
    October 4, 2009 8:11 am

    I am fascinated – and to some degree, horrified – by the actions of our POTUS and others on the Left vis-a-vis Honduras! To cancel a visa issued to their interim President from entering the US, to prevent our elected officials from visiting Honduras (at least in an official capacity) is nothing short of dictatorial actions & edicts in themselves! And to hear the lying, empty words of our Leftist POTUS and Sec. of State decrying the non-existant “coup” (thanks, WaPo, for a great & truthful overview of the situation in Honduras!), just makes my blood boil. Not that I expected any better from the creeps at MSNBC, but because I absolutely NEVER listen to them (they might as well be speaking Russian or Chinese; I never test my knowledge of their language…), I was unaware of Rachel Mad Cow’s rants & lies. As they say, “Don’t get me started!”

    Meantime, I hope & pray the the November elections will bring some sort of calm or settlement to this vexing situation – although, in all truth, I do believe that the Communist left in Central American and here in our country (in this Administration) will continue to bleat for Zayala; they are incapable of turning on a dime.

  5. TangetMan permalink
    October 27, 2009 1:18 pm

    Um, for one, President Zelaya was overthrown by the military and sent into exile in June 2009 and Roberto Micheletti was installed as President. Zelaya’s term was not supposed to end until January of 2010. That is a coup. Secondly, Jim DeMint went to Honduras and met with Micheletti which the White House had forbidden. That was a violation of the Logan Act.

    Get your facts straight.


  1. Bush 41 Calls Maddow and Olbermann “Sick Puppies” « NewsReal Blog

Comments are closed.