Skip to content

Unfair Rush To Judgment About Rush

October 13, 2009

Rush today.parcolmem44.4091

Bill O’Reilly was in good form last night, defending (against attacks by race-baiters) Rush Limbaugh’s right to c0-purchase a National Football League team, the St. Louis Rams.

O’Reilly’s guest on The Factor was a Detroit sportswriter who was unable to back up his claims that Limbaugh had made blatantly racist comments on his radio program.

Predictably, the practiced demagogue Al Sharpton is now getting into the act.  Sharpton reportedly wants to meet with NFL commissioner Roger Goodell about Limbaugh, who Sharpton contends should not be allowed to buy the football team.

Sharpton has pointed out that back in 2003, when Limbaugh was working as an analyst for the ESPN sports network, the broadcaster opined that Philadelphia Eagles quarterback Donovan McNabb was getting special treatment from the media because of his race.

Were Rush’s comments provactive?  Yes.  Racist? Absolutely not.

Rush was asserting that members of the press, for fear of being branded as racists, had been afraid to give an honest assessment of a player (McNabb) whose performance at that time was nothing special.

Ironically, Rush’s critics have typically embraced leftist policies like affirmative action, which have planted, in the minds of many Americans, seeds of doubt about the legitimacy of black achievements in many realms outside the world of sports. Yet when black conservatives such as Clarence Thomas have spoken out against affirmative action, they have been excoriated by leftists of all skin tones. Jesse Jackson, for one, condemned Thomas’s Supreme Court vote to place limits on affirmative action programs as:

“a brutally violent act” that, “in effect, stabbed Dr. King,… paving the way back toward slavery.”

Along with Al Sharpton, Jackson led a prayer vigil outside Thomas’s home to protest the Justice’s decision.  Likening Thomas to a Klansman, Jackson asserted:

“At night, the enemies of civil rights strike in white sheets, burning crosses…. By day, they strike in black robes”.

That’s certainly racially charged rhetoric, but I would defend Jackson’s right to express his views even while strongly opposing their content.  The last time I checked, this was still a free country.  Jackson can say what he wants.  Sharpton can say what he wants.  Black conservatives should be able to say what they want. And so should Rush Limbaugh, without being boycotted by the National Football League and prohibited from spending his own money on a football team.

Advertisements
5 Comments
  1. Lawler Nicoteri permalink
    October 13, 2009 8:51 am

    Rush, too bad you are not black, female, or gay (or all three)you’d be welcomed unanimously. You might even be awarded a Nobel Prize.

  2. October 13, 2009 9:41 am

    I have no problem with Limbaugh buying any business he sees fit.

    But I wonder if he will fight against the NFL’s “socialist” profit sharing where by the larger, more profitable teams (NYG, NYJ, Bears…) must pay into a pool from which the smaller market, unprofitable teams (StL Rams) get paid?

    How will Limbaugh handle the new stadium issue? Surely he isn’t going to let the government help him with a facility for a private corporation to conduct their business is he?

  3. Brad Lytle permalink
    October 14, 2009 5:18 am

    There’s way too much racism on all sides.

    There is only ONE RACE: HUMAN

  4. Steve permalink
    October 14, 2009 6:50 am

    Well the whole thing, is that there is this “quote” that people are repeating about something Rush allegedly said. Which, no one has audio/video of, its all hearsay.
    Rush has put out a formal letter stating that if they do not produce audio/video of this that they will be forced to put out a retraction. Its very interesting the attacks with no basis that are coming against Rush.
    I’m willing to bet that in 2 years that the Rams win their division.

Trackbacks

  1. A Fascinating Perspective on Rush Limbaugh, the NFL, and Race « NewsReal Blog

Comments are closed.