Skip to content

Ask David Horowitz: Marc Lamont Hill Being Canned

October 18, 2009


David Swindle: What are your thoughts on Marc Lamont Hill being fired from Fox News?

David Horowitz: He should never have been hired.

“Ask David Horowitz” is a new feature in which readers can pose questions to NewsReal’s Editor-In-Chief to help better understand the issues of the day. If you have a question you would like to be considered for this feature then please email NewsReal’s managing editor David Swindle: DavidSwindle AT Gmail Dot com. Questions pertaining to ongoing subjects of discussion and items appearing on NewsReal are more likely to be used.

  1. FelixPrismus permalink
    October 18, 2009 12:47 pm

    I’m just worried that Hill getting fired is just going to give the media leftists more idiotic slander ammo against FOX

    “You see they fired him just like they canned Colmes!” “another ultra-conservative bigotry move by FOX” “RACIST” etc.

    • Walt permalink
      October 19, 2009 7:40 am

      I doubt that Hill will cause much of a stir. There are serious leftists who would fare far better than Hill on Fox News. Dr. Hill was practically a joke during his appearances, and was a credit to no one.

  2. politicalmoxie permalink
    October 18, 2009 1:01 pm

    I laughed out loud.

  3. Mike permalink
    October 18, 2009 3:01 pm

    More idiotic slander ammo?

    Rahm Emanuel went on CNN this morning and said this: “The way to look at it, and the way we — the President looks at it and we look at it, it’s not a news organization so much as it has perspective. And that’s a different take. And more importantly is not have the CNNs and the others in the world basically be led in following Fox, as if that, what they’re trying to do is a legitimate news organization in the sense of both sides, a sense of a valued opinion.”

    When the President and his staff are against you who cares what CNN, Media Matters, etc. think.

    • Walt permalink
      October 19, 2009 7:42 am

      At least Fox News was above board enough to get rid of Dr. Hill. CNN and MSNBC would simply shuffle such a person around until their contract expired. Hill was an insult to his own side.

  4. Cas Balicki permalink
    October 18, 2009 3:12 pm

    I love that Obama and his bullies are attacking Fox, because it is the wrong way to go. It will be interesting to watch their reaction when some other now in-the-tank network turns on this them. What will they say then? What will they do then? In politics some portion of the population is always against you, and the onus falls on the politician to learn to live with that fact or get out of politics. But when you are an empty suit, I guess you can’t do that given how perilously close you are to deflation and collapse.

  5. AuntWie permalink
    October 18, 2009 11:22 pm


  6. Alheimstead permalink
    October 19, 2009 1:52 am

    Obama began bullying Fox news about 6 months ago. But, no one jumped on board with Obama. As a result, the administration is just getting louder about it. This strategy will only backfire. Everyone is so sick of Obama, his Chicago style politics, the Czars and especially Anita Dunn. Each attempt by Obama and/or his administration to split, results in increased alienation and anger by the American people. Knew it was a matter of time before Obama tried again to hound Fox. Then, low and behold, in walks Czar Anita Dunn, Rahm and Axelrod, into the picture! Yep, this is where our tax $$$$ is going. Paying Czars and others, to stir more Obama propaganda, Chicago style!….Obama’s Behaviorist Czar – is not performing well. Bad advice encouraging Obama to smear Fox news. Guess as far as the communist Obamamites are concerned, the war is on.

    Everyday, this administration has one or more bizarre outburst. This administration is an embarrassment to all of us decent, hard working, tax paying, patriotic Americans.

  7. Kevroc permalink
    October 19, 2009 3:12 am

    P2+ Total Day
    FNC – 1,389,000 viewers
    CNN – 545,000 viewers
    MSNBC –359,000 viewers
    CNBC – 181,000 viewers
    HLN – 301,000 viewers

    P2+ Prime Time
    FNC – 2,473,000viewers
    CNN— 909,000 viewers
    MSNBC –675,000 viewers
    CNBC – 126,000 viewers
    HLN – 531,000 viewers

    I wouldn’t worry if I were FOX.

    They look “too big to fail”.


    • Brad Lytle permalink
      October 19, 2009 5:40 am

      Dear Kevroc,

      To be sure, these are great stats, but let’s not forget to add all of the numbers for CNN, MSNBC, CNBC and HLN together, then the numbers of CBS, ABC, NBC, PBS, also most of the daily newspapers and weekly newsmagazines, along with the History Channel, Discovery Channel, National Geographic and others must be added to get a true picture of the what Fox is up against in their efforts to report “fair & balanced” news.

      • politicalmoxie permalink
        October 19, 2009 10:19 am

        Brad Lytle

        Sounds like viewer envy to me…

  8. Gretchen permalink
    October 19, 2009 4:33 am

    It will be interesting to see if the White House’s attack on Fox will work out as well as their attacks against Rush. Fox, like Rush will be laughing all the way to the bank. Watch for their numbers to go even higher as more and more independents and moderates fall away from obama. Gotta love the irony in the democrat’s childish, petulant behavior. They are truly in an echo chamber.

  9. jac mills permalink
    October 19, 2009 5:40 am

    David Swindle on Marc Hill and Fox:

    “He should never have been hired,” you stated, and I agree. But finish the thought, please. Hill was hired probably because he is black, and that makes a difference in the argument. That is not a racist comment I have made, nor is it racial in content. Call it what you like, however, but please do not be afraid of it, as too many in this country are. Surely it is right for Fox to have diversity of comment and commentators, and Fox, as well as all journalists, should not hesitate to say so. Pussy-footing just exacerbates the black/white division in the United States while giving those who would exploit the topic more fuel for their ill-conceived and usually self-promoting agendas. Cases in point: Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton.

    • October 19, 2009 6:21 am

      He’s already expressed the thought you’re making when he first called him out as Fox’s Affirmative Action Baby:

      • jac mills permalink
        October 19, 2009 7:53 am

        Thank you, David. I am rather new to the site so must have missed it. But it is worth repeating.

        • October 19, 2009 8:16 am

          Welcome! Glad to have you. 🙂

    • politicalmoxie permalink
      October 19, 2009 10:43 am

      jac mills

      I couldn’t type fast enough or long enough to cover the 30 minute rant I can do on the RACISM Sharpton & Jackson have have gotten away with over the years. When it is used, RACIST is a word that should indicate a serious character flaw. Thanks, in large part, to the 2 REV’s (I’ve been looking for their churches for years)the word now carries the same shame as being called a “twinkie head”.

      Welcome to News Real, you’re gonna love it here!

      • jac mills permalink
        October 19, 2009 4:30 pm

        Thank you, politicalmoxie. Looks like a good site. You certainly can pick ’em in Sharpton and Jackson, two free-loading big spenders who have used the race card and other racial tools to amass fortunes which, apparently, are vast. All you have to do with Jackson, for instance, is to look at his family’s history in Chicago business/politics/community organization, and you will get the stink from when Jackson held hostage Budweiser, resulting in his son getting the largest beer distributorship around. And he still has it, of course. Evil is that man’s middle name.

  10. jac mills permalink
    October 19, 2009 5:45 am

    My previous post on Marc Hill and Fox should have ben addressed to David Horowitz rather than to David Swindle. I apologize to both gentlemen.

  11. James permalink
    October 19, 2009 7:21 am

    I blame Bill O’Reilly for bringing in Marc lamont Hill. Bill is soft on Obama and getting soft in the head. What qualification did Bill see that convinced him that this guys opinion matters?

    • jac mills permalink
      October 19, 2009 12:23 pm

      Qualification? Being b lack, James, but Hill was taken on by O’Reilly show under the guise of a Ph.D. But the advanced degree is in RAP, isn’t it? BOR fooled a few for a while, and maybe it has paid off for him because of the stir it has caused. Ratings, my friend. BOR is like many of his ilk: an opportunist who seemingly would do much to get his ratings.

  12. h2AmeriWay permalink
    October 19, 2009 12:16 pm

    Dr Marc Lamont Hill is the perfect example of a Marxist produced by our institutions of higher education which have been infiltrated by Communist professors and Marxist dogma over the past 55 years. This dogma combined with the moral decline of American youth over the years, plus the promotion of false values via the entertainment industry have produced the decline of our country and the devalued free market Capitalist system. This America of ours must be saved from the evils of despots, Chicago thugs, ACORN, SEIU and all the other tax payer funded Marxist organizations hell bent on the destruction of this great Nation. Knowledge is Power, Words are Power! The awakened Americans must spread the word of freedom and truth to our younger generations who have been dumbed down in our public schools.

  13. October 19, 2009 6:34 pm

    And who is David Horowitz again? I’m sure you wouldn’t find any African American on the show to be qualified to speak on any subject. Why is Glenn Beck allowed to continue his racist and unpointed views on Fox?

    • Kevroc permalink
      October 19, 2009 9:59 pm


      Please back up your claim that Beck is a racist with some factual evidence.

      These baseless claims are horrendous. Calling someone a racist is no small thing. It is heinous personal attack. I didn’t approve of Beck calling Obama one without proof either FWIW.

      I’m tired of people crying “racist”. Please do not do this without a valid claim. It is cheap, ugly and very offensive.

  14. October 19, 2009 9:50 pm

    Foxnews has been fair & they needed to fire Lamont Hill because that dude was dangerously over the edge. BTW, foxnews canned Edde Hill during the elections. And Edde was a conservative.

    I went to Lamont Hill’s tweeter site, at
    And he tweeted the following:

    “If anyone called me today in the afternoon, I didn’t get your message. My blackberry crashed. I still don’t have internet…about 3 hours ago from web ”

    Now, personally I think he is ducking & dodging Swindle’s messages. How the hell can a Professor of a University not have internet & a have a blackberry out of service. Its not believable. Furthermore, how the heck was he able to do his tweets w/out some kind of online service.

    • October 20, 2009 7:16 am

      “Now, personally I think he is ducking & dodging Swindle’s messages.”

      Of course. You think if he’s going to scrub his websites and delete his myspace he’s going to engage us in debate? He was actually doing the smart thing by trying to ignore us. In all likelihood the whole controversy should have just blown over and he would have continued as if nothing had happened. We got LUCKY.

      Nice blog btw.

  15. mike permalink
    October 20, 2009 7:10 pm

    “Dr.” Hill had a doctorate in what? Rap? The man was a joke.

Comments are closed.