Skip to content

Obama Takes Possession of the War in Afghanistan

October 29, 2009


The only thing the Left can get right about warmaking is the primacy of deception as a tool to be used against your enemy.

Exchanges between Washington journalists on this week’s Washington Week in Review highlighted, to a controlled extent, just how poorly the Obama administration is advancing national defense issues.

One of the most startling admissions about the White House policy drift concerning the war in Afghanistan was made by a panelist, National Journal writer James Kitfield, in an Oct 17 issue where he described a White House that was “nervously eyeing the polls about Afghanistan…” much the way Obama’s Republican predecessor did. Politics isn’t what’s on the line here, though. The lives of America’s soldiers are at stake.

Another admission by Kitfield is that White House staff are reading books about the Vietnam war:

“…where U.S. soldiers fought and bled for five years after the 1968 Tet offensive arguably broke the will of the American public”

Lovely. Way to distort US military history, Mr. Kitfield. It is almost as if he wants to underline the fact that the Left’s knowledge of history is seriously lacking in policy debates.

We probably should have taken the hint with the Obama World Apology Tour 2009 this last spring that the Obama administration was not interested in winning against an armed foreign enemy.

More than two and a half months after the original request for more troops by Obama’s handpicked successor in Afghanistan, General Stanley McChrystal, we are just now learning that for at least a month meetings have been held with Obama’s foreign policy and defense staffs on Afghanistan to deal with those additional troops.

In a vain attempt to give his stamp of approval Kitfield said:

“In some ways, I think he’s more deliberative. President Bush was very gut instincts and so he made decisions pretty quickly. Obama is much more a logical sort of going through all the options and comparing and then debating those with people and he obviously likes to encourage people to speak up, where it wasn’t really what Bush was known for.”


According to an article published by The Weekly Standard, the Bush White House already went over all the options two years ago for several months before it became so important to consult the polls. The only reason why the effort in Afghanistan was not reinforced was because of the lack of available troops.

Despite the Left’s attempts to blame Bush for everything, there is one thing Kitfield got right: Afghanistan is quickly becoming Obama’s war.

  1. MaryAnn permalink
    October 29, 2009 8:30 am

    And while Obama is being logical, comparing and debating, our men and women are dying. Afganistan became his war when he was elected, especially since it is the one he said is the right one. Obama is, in my opinion, a political and moral coward.

  2. October 29, 2009 3:57 pm

    I have said it before and I will say it again, without qualm… Obama is intentionally permitting the global Muslim population and the entire global Socialist community to build their forces, including throughout Afghanistan, Pakistan, Iran, Russia, and North Korea, in order to advance the New World Order as a global social/nationalist state, while our Military withers nearby, nearly helplessly, as a confused and compliant Congress helps to weaken America to second world status at the speed of lightning.

  3. October 30, 2009 5:59 am

    If it becomes ‘Obama’s War’ we can be certain it will end in defeat and disaster.

Comments are closed.