Skip to content

Kathy Shaidle Has a Hilarious Response to Some Hate Mail

November 2, 2009


NewsReal’s Kathy Shaidle has a very funny post today over at her Five Feet of Fury blog:

Andrew Richmond at writes:

Mark Stern was not being criminally prosecuted, he was not “on trial”. You and your cronies are a bunch of whiny terds.

“why is there not media outrage?” because nobody cares. Mark Stern is a d——–g and everyone knows it, and so are you. TVO covered it for a f—ing hour.

“The Tyranny of Nice” how f—ing privileged you are, that all you have to whinge about is people took offence to an article and wanted to respond to it. go f— yourself. you poop. lol

Kathy poopface

Visit Five Feet of Fury to see Kathy’s hilarious response to this loser.

  1. Harmon permalink
    November 2, 2009 7:36 pm

    Things must be really, really slooooooooooow at Newsrealblog today. LOL

    • November 2, 2009 7:41 pm

      Oh come on. I found it hilarious. We’ve got other stuff on deck, don’t worry. There’s ALWAYS stuff going on. A slow day doesn’t exist.

      • Harmon permalink
        November 3, 2009 9:09 am

        Well, I would agree that the email was disgusting, however I think that Ms. Shaidle is seeing attention by posting it. It seems to me that if you receive such emails you move on. I am sure everyone who posts online gets such email whether the subject email is left or right. Was her point that the emailer got one letter wrong in Mr. Steyn’s name or that she published what she thought was the emailer’s real name?

        Personnaly, I think the funniest posts here have been those that suggest that Anita Dunn in a follower of Mao and wants to murder everyone. Anyone who believes such silliness is worthy of much laughter and scorn. Mind you that various Republicans have quoted Mao as well.

        • In the Know permalink
          November 3, 2009 10:10 am

          From what you understand, of course?

        • Jack Hampton permalink
          November 3, 2009 12:11 pm

          Can you poit to a comment where someone made the claim that Dunn wanted to murder everyone? I would like to review that comment.

      • Vince permalink
        November 4, 2009 7:40 pm

        David Swindle. Have you seen this?

        • Vince permalink
          November 4, 2009 7:45 pm

          My mistake

          • November 4, 2009 7:50 pm

            I’ve heard about it. What about it?

            • Vince permalink
              November 5, 2009 10:20 am

              I wasn’t aware if you had seen this site. There is so much out thereon these two and their cronnies. How is it possible they weren’t exposed?

  2. Louie723 permalink
    November 2, 2009 10:55 pm

    Whenever I recieve email with lots of F-Bombs, I know it’s from a lefty. They then then proceed to laugh at their clever use of language. Simple pleasures for simple minds.

  3. shane comeback permalink
    November 3, 2009 4:18 am

    Hey AndrewRichmond at I really laffed at poopface LOL Funniest thing I ever seed. Andrew,you seriously need to get your own blog! Poopface,LOL! Then we cud reed you sum more. Terd, LOL!! Man,you owe me a keybord!

  4. November 3, 2009 4:30 am

    Just wish Ms. Shaidle didn’t respond. Vital mental energy units are better spent on better things, and not wasted on serial mis-spellers and verbal turd-hurlers like Richmond. Oppositional debate is healthy, but that hate-rant don’t rate. Doesn’t NR have some kind of pest control stuff like “Off!” or “Raid” to spray on those kind of readers’ comments?

  5. Charles Louis D'Ince permalink
    November 3, 2009 5:50 am

    Quel Ouanquère, oo eez zis Richmerde?

  6. John Davidson permalink
    November 3, 2009 7:30 am

    The best way for some people to feel good when the spent most of their lives as parasites, is to mock those that made life better for more than just one person.

  7. "gunner" permalink
    November 3, 2009 10:10 am

    i’m surprised that kathy even bothers to reply to, or even acknowedge such juvenile tripe.

  8. November 3, 2009 10:45 am

    I don’t want to turn this into a downer, but I find it disquieting that people like AR might be registered to vote.

  9. November 3, 2009 12:44 pm

    Concerning those who like to respond to an attempt at intelligent debate with lots of explitives the following. People who have to use curse words to get a point across are intellectually vacuous.

    Swearing is base and vulgar vernacular from the visceral part of our being. If you have to respond to such vulgarity remind the respondent that they should ‘get a life’ with more lofty pursuits to engage in.

    People like this have way to much time alone on their hands. The best course of course is not to respond at all, or refuse to resort to their base level as you continue the debate with them.

    A high mind is most affective. A low mind is of no redeaming value, as all things in gutters and cesspools is so disposed. The high and low mind is also the central difference in conservative and liberal exchange of views. It is the difference between rational thought and acting on feelings.

    The Turban Torpedo

  10. November 5, 2009 9:21 am

    This is extremely frustrating, happening immediately after I recommended this website to most of my friends. I am sooo sorry that this happened on NewsReal Blog! Such an overwhelming waste of pixels, time, bandwidth, electricity…

    I try to learn from everyone, but some lessons are just repeated… This lesson? Well, irritated hateful folks use cuss words, and dirty potty language. Those who have had the poo flung at them get irritated and fall down into the sewer of revenge and “out” the bad poo-heads by putting their name (maybe) online for all to see (to embarrass them or so others will gang up on the nasty irritated meanie flinging bathroom words).

    Sorry, this lesson is repeated in zoos around the world every day as monkeys fling poo at irritating visitors, not really “News” worthy to my view.

    • November 5, 2009 9:32 am

      Lighten up.

    • Jack Hampton permalink
      November 6, 2009 1:51 am

      Mrs. Shaidle censored the bad words she did not print them but her job is reporting on these matters. I think she accomplished it with aplomb.

Comments are closed.