Skip to content

UN: Forget Science – Climate Change Should Be A Religion

December 2, 2009

According to newly revealed doccuments authored two years ago, the United Nations believes environmentalism should be regarded on the same level with religion “as the only compelling, value-based narrative available to humanity.”

That’s right. This global body is urging the world to take the ‘crisis’  of global warming on faith. Father Earth, Al Gore concurs.

“This is not a political issue, or a scientific issue or a psychological issue – it’s a moral issue. If anything it’s actually a spiritual issue.”

There you have it. The world should regard the environment as a religion and take on faith the fact that billions of dollars are needed to fix this so-called man-made crisis.

It looks like the world has no choice in the matter. The scientists at the University of East Anglia have admitted throwing away much of the raw temperature data on which their predictions of global warming are based. Oops. So the scientific data on which the premise of global warming is based are no longer available for peer-review. Sorry. Just take their word that its scientific.

And by the way, we are told to ignore the evidence  came to light on November 20, in the form of hacked e-mails that “appear to show a conspiracy to falsify data and suppress academic debate in order to exaggerate the possible threat of man-made global warming.” Hey, the UN isn’t letting this scientific scandal interfere with their plans.

There is “virtually no possibility” of a few scientists biasing the advice given to governments by the UN’s top global warming body, its chair said today.

In a shocking abrogation of journalistic ethics, the mainstream media in the United States has failed to report on  what’s been dubbed the greatest scientific scandal of our generation. – Climate-gate. World leaders are also united in ignoring any inconvenient facts that might derail the upcoming  UN climate summit in Copenhagen. As is our own President.

According to these experts, all global citizens should just relax and take a deep breath. No need for worry or scientific proof, just take their word that the earth is melting and global governance is the solution. Have faith.

Advertisements
14 Comments
  1. Robert Moen permalink
    December 2, 2009 12:40 pm

    The purloined emails that many now call ‘Climategate’ underscore the need for the United States to convene its own objective, transparent Climate Truth Commission. The emails strongly suggest that some of the science behind man-made global warming is not rock solid and that the scientific consensus is in part the product of silencing or marginalizing those who might upset it.

    — Robert Moen, http://www.energyplanUSA.com

    • F. Swemson permalink
      December 2, 2009 2:24 pm

      Robert;

      There’s actually no need whatsoever for us to create another bureaucratic organization such as a “Climate Truth Commission” as you suggest, because there’s absolutely no reason why we should be studying this issue at all. Here’s the reason why:

      Virtually all of the more rational spokesmen on radio & TV (including FOX), have been missing the most significant aspect of the entire global warming hoax, the biggest part of the big lie, and it’s so simple that’s it’s been staring us right in the face from the very beginning.

      Warming isn’t bad… Warming is good!

      There’s absolutely nothing about global warming that threatens life in any way whatsoever. Like everything we hear from our government, and the media elites in recent years, the truth is the exact opposite of what they tell us. Warming is good.

      All forms of life flourish when the planet is warm! The only type of climate change that we should be concerned about is extreme cooling, and there’s nothing that we can do about it in either case other than learn to adapt ourselves to it.

      Here’s a simple way to prove this point to anyone. Just ask them the following question:

      “Where would you rather live: On a balmy warm island in the Caribbean, or in Northern Greenland with the Eskimos ?”

      I think it’s pretty darn obvious which environment is more hospitable to life.

      As I explained in my recent series on this subject, during the medieval warm period, which the liars at the IPCC tried to hide altogether with their deliberately dishonest “Hockey Stick” graph, ALL living things flourished in temperatures roughly 3.5°C (5.4°F) warmer than we are today. There were vineyards and wineries in Northern Scotland, and Greenland, was actually GREEN !

      It’s a far bigger lie than simply fudging some of the data.

      Here’s the 2nd most important aspect of the hoax that virtually all commentators seem to ignore.

      CO2 has NEVER had any measurable effect on climate change at all. It’s plant food for crying out loud!

      This is just as easy to prove to anyone using nothing more than Common Sense !.

      Once again, just ask anyone the following 2 questions:

      What percentage of the atmosphere do you think CO2 accounts for?
      And what percentage of the total amount of CO2 do you suppose is man made?

      The average respondent answers the first part of this little quiz by saying anywhere from 10% to 35%, and about the same for the portion of the total that’s man made. They’re almost all left speechless when you tell them the real answer. CO2 accounts for only about half of 1% (0.5%) of the atmosphere, and the portion of that total created by man’s use of fossil fuels is roughly the same, half of 1% (0.5%). Do the math and you’ll see that man made CO2 accounts for only 0.0025% of the atmosphere!

      I think it’s also pretty obvious that such an infinitesimal portion of the earth’s atmosphere couldn’t possibly have a meaningful, much less a major effect on global temperatures.

      Climate change hysteria has been going on since the beginning of recorded history. It’s always the same. The reason for it is that evil men, trying to satisfy their lust for power, make up these absurd stories to try to fool people into giving them great wealth and power. And since catastrophes help sell newspapers, the media ALWAYS supports these lies.

      When you consider the fact that the industrialized nations of the world have already pissed away more than $50 Billion this his time around, it truly is the biggest scientific scandal in history.

      You can learn a lot more details about this amazing pile of lies in my series, which begins here:

      http://newsrealblog.com/2009/11/01/lord-monckton-challenges-global-warming-on-glenn-beck-part-1/

  2. December 2, 2009 1:05 pm

    The clergy of Climate Science have it all bass-ackwards. Theirs is a solution in search of a problem. The solution is the decapitalization and deindustrialization of Western society.

    The problem, however, isn’t what they initally thought it to be. Apparently, adding more CO2 to the atmosphere doesn’t necessarily lead to a rise in temperature. There has been no warming over the past decade, even though CO2 levels have increased.

    So now we’re told to accept the conclusions of the clergy of Climate Science on faith, and faith alone.

  3. Carterthewriter permalink
    December 2, 2009 1:20 pm

    Now. if these UN representatives would come over here on a sailing ship, I might be convinced they were sincere.

  4. December 2, 2009 1:21 pm

    There is very little science involved in ‘climate science’. From the start this has been a giant hoax. Both the ‘global cooling’ of the 1970’s and the ‘global warming’ of today have as the very same solutions – which just happen to dovetail exactly with the liberal agenda: population control, wealth redistribution and global governance.

    • Carterthewriter permalink
      December 2, 2009 1:35 pm

      Let’s not forget Y2K and the end of the world prophecies in between.

  5. Nick Shaw permalink
    December 2, 2009 3:38 pm

    In the 70’s I stocked up on long johns and Sterno. In the 00’s I stocked up on sunsceen and Pina Colada mix. What am I gonna do with all this stuff? Oh wait….it’s Pina Colada mix.

    • December 2, 2009 4:58 pm

      Which makes an excellent mixer with Sterno–or so an alcoholic survivalist once told me. 🙂

  6. Dave Grenier permalink
    December 2, 2009 6:49 pm

    Remember when candidate Obama criticized the Republicans for ignoring science concerning such matters as stem cell research and AIDs? Didn’t you just KNOW that he was going to be a hypocrite when it came to climate science?

  7. Radegunda permalink
    December 2, 2009 8:27 pm

    It’s funny how the people who have always said that religion was invented just to control people have now … invented a religion with which to control people.

  8. Mike permalink
    December 3, 2009 1:03 pm

    I am looking forward to real climate change in Washington. That is to say, it’s time to through the bums out starting in 2010 and completeing the task the Presidential Election. 0-bama is a loser and our MSM failed to do their job when this ametuer was elected!!

  9. Julie Trevor permalink
    December 3, 2009 5:09 pm

    Gee, I just bought David Horowitz’s “Unholy Alliance – Radical Islam and the American Left”.

    So is his next book going to be “Sinful Scams: Radical Environmentalism and the United Nations”?

Trackbacks

  1. UN: Forget Science – Climate Change Should Be A Religion - United Nations Jobs
  2. CRU Files Betray Climate Alarmists' Funding Hypocrisy - Page 2 - Penis Forum

Comments are closed.